On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:15 AM, John Sonnenschein <johnsonnenschein at gmail.com> wrote: > Simon, > > I still very much disagree with your notion that communities ought to > be formed by existing CC's. There are plenty of us whose work does not > fall under the blanket of another community group , who would then not > be able to form their own CG's to organize it. Since the entire > proposal seems built upon this notion, I'm going to have to give the > entire thing my -1 .
I will have to echo John's comments here. I would rather resolve this during the "vetting process" that occurs during instantiation then attempt to restrict the creation of CGs. Part of the CG instantiation process, as I understand it, is receiving approval for the proposed set of contributors. The OGB directly approves the proposed core/contributor grants. If a member of the OGB or community felt that the grants proposed had not been adequately justified, then the proposal should not be accepted. Cheers, -- Shawn Walker "To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." - Robert Orben
