Garrett D'Amore wrote: > Each of the items above has things that touch multiple consolidations, > some projects which may be entirely unrelated to one another, and > potentially fairly disparate areas of interest within the potential SIG.
Can you expound on this thought? Do you see the distinction between SIG and Component as a good or bad thing? I'm confused by your list + statement here - if there was (say) an accessibility SIG, how do you see it fostering "projects which may be entirely unrelated to one another"? Wouldn't all the projects fostered by the accessibility SIG be, by definition, related to accessibility? -John
