John Sonnenschein wrote: > On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Jim Walker <James.Walker at sun.com> wrote: > >> Shawn Walker wrote: >> > On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 1:17 AM, Cyril Plisko <cyril.plisko at >> mountall.com> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Brandorr <brandorr at opensolaris.org> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > "Alternate platform" community group? Or perhaps "Hardware porting"? >> >> > >> >> >> >> IIRC, in the previous round of there was suggestion to call it >> >> "Platform porting" >> >> or similar. I think it is a good one. >> > >> > Platform is also often associated with the underlying OS. From what I >> > understand, this group is about porting the same "platform" (OS) to >> > multiple architectures. >> > >> > "Platform Architecture" anyone? :-) >> >> I like "Platform Porting" community. >> >> The current PowerPC community could become a sponsored project >> instead of a community. >> >> I don't want it to get it confused with the software >> Architecture Process and Tools CG. >> > > > I know that Gentoo just calls the entirety of the non-ia32/amd64 > community the Alt community ( Gentoo/Alt ) ... > > Why not something like the "Alternative Architecture" CG? > >
Technically, each platform should be a Project of the single Porting CG. benr.
