Hi Diebold^H^H^H^H^H^H^HStephen, (kidding - it was too obvious a joke not to be made)
Your 60 hour extension plan for those 33 members sounds fine to me. Thanks for finding the bug before-hand... better before than after. cheers, steve Stephen Hahn wrote: > I spent last night tweaking my reporting scripts so I could quickly > turn out the HTML report this morning. Unfortunately, once > I started collating results, I ran into some problems. What I > found what that 33 ballots appear spoiled, due to a bug handling > abstentions. (213 of the 246 ballots received have no abstentions > and are fine.) The affected ballots have hash IDs > > 4b4a44efeb8945823211d2af418110d4809d69c8 > 824b361cc6b2a6dbca9c5c2799aabb01bd557cf7 > 40a251928308d43b5584ca22a20bf9ad58c45ed5 > a7043867cf2560e7b8260b58b813c3781ed73325 > 8a23e461662bbfd696c18814c315d980e06ce6b8 > f99d25fb05d0e29e59271da811a5cc2eb006aabf > 7d7426186ed40e8a615772edc116fb66ff6d1c83 > f685d78ec93decd49c74069a77243ad663fa7f80 > c38220792dcce6b79b78fa8baecb2898a32d0d23 > 4abe130751edfc5c7c40920fea910b810f55a70f > 9713c856b731ddd23201044d62b0d3f132ccd89d > 1f77e97137d4cf8cd5b1f244a744010b887356bc > eafc8c53de06b5cbc4f367fd9af7bc0a8a4136fd > 7f7192c83f27259601e1a97d336e290c798ea1da > 19e6130ce4d185543166e8cb970bebc11f6e9cd2 > c707aaf081ce5d2f3d3ea53373a978f106079afe > 6a94751a2816d327db526374210668123bbe1c1a > dcccea899110b4f8f6c260525cf90f661b10d115 > 994312f0cd8f2dd070b5c105366996074dfd31a8 > ae751b6cf617967c63c80a2ecd470f6fc165d6d9 > 6458886e0ecd0300f8cc0671b99848be66b76438 > aa4579f548342c1a9fcd12d35131933cc1e3055e > 51d2cfaf38cad50ea5ae10300bbedee4ea5230ef > 0f59c5bc7ff9b27e44f1731c69106a5c62295460 > 90866cc3f7e75fc02dbb2d906815e9f58e83359b > b84c42a95e32d881dabf46e152cc563a7d440d66 > 1314413c21d979072a40e64c18d53953dc21498d > d74c7c7074c626e0ff946f49f00523dd5eb14799 > bee7c4a6297a7f798db5f9eb603c19d448c7d172 > 48c10523b51f823d66d6335ae44e21c12e8b6e8e > efe9784a26512b50543d122c56685c8b7f8b8ebc > d5e725df6b8a7c01c826fa2b2993f2e66e3397d5 > 836f7ebf62000fbc550a2983d80fd5ea808e232e > > Since I am effectively the Elections Committee, my > proposal--after apologizing for not catching this test case--is > that I delete these 33 ballots so that those members may revote, > extend the election until we have 33 new ballots from those members > or until 235959 PDT Thursday (whichever occurs first), and issue nag > mails for those periods. (Ballots submitted during this extension by > members who hadn't voted during the original period will be ignored.) > An alternative is to invalidate all 33 ballots entirely, but that is > 1/8 of the received votes. > > Suggestions, objections welcomed; flagellations accepted. If there are no > comments by 113000 PDT today, I'll act according to the above proposal. > > Apologies > Stephen > > [] The patch follows. > > --- Voting.py.ORIG Tue Mar 25 09:16:11 2008 > +++ Voting.py Tue Mar 25 09:15:40 2008 > @@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ > """, accept_question_response, len(q.answers)) > > if result == "": > - ballot_blt = "1 0; " > + ballot_blt += "1 0; " > ballot_hr[q.short_desc] = "[ -abstain- ]" > > else: > > > -- stephen lau | stevel at opensolaris.org | www.whacked.net
