John Plocher wrote: > I updated > > http://www.genunix.org/wiki/index.php/OGB_2008/010 > > with the stuff we talked about on today's call. There is considerable > room for improvement, especially in the last two sections, which are > pretty content free right now :-) >
Thanks, John. I'll put some stuff on the wiki later tonight or tomorrow, but a couple of quick comments: I'm not sure you posted the last draft of the proposal that we were going to work from. There were many drafts, and we added some roles that made sense as people commented, and the roles were intentionally put under each collective group since Alan felt that was easier to understand and also how the app would actually view the data (if I explained that properly). That is the draft I'm talking about: http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2008-July/005896.html Also, as I explained on the call, we should focus on the information that we need to move to the next step, which was asked for 10 weeks ago by the infrastructure team: (1) group categories, (2) roles within each group, (3) and relationships (if any) between the groups. That's it. That's what we have to vote on next week. The membership process/committee and the group creation process/committee are not tied to the initial decisions of the first three items, so we ought to defer them so we can move faster. Jim -- http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris/
