Jim Grisanzio wrote: > Glynn and some others have been talking about SIGs as one of the > collective types we should have. In the current proposal, I have > Communities replacing Community Groups. So, now we have Communities vs > SIGs hanging out there. From a practical perspective, I see the two > groups as absolutely identical under the new structure, so we don't need > both of them. Let's pick one right now. > > We may be able to clarify things by choosing SIGs over Communities. The > term Community Groups has always been confusing since we also refer to > the entire OpenSolaris community as a community. So, if we replace > Communities with SIGs, it becomes easier to explain the OpenSolaris > community as consisting of a few groups -- Projects, SIGs, User Groups > and an Electorate. Now the term /community/ refers to one thing -- the > /entire/ community. Easier? I'm sure Glynn already made this point, but > can we decide this one issue in this thread before the vote on Monday? > Shouldn't take more than one day to decide this, I would imagine.
+1 - I would certainly support this. -- Shawn Walker
