On Apr 20, 2007, at 20:29, Keith M Wesolowski wrote: > Some project names are given to this, some aren't. The ability to use > whizzy names remains important.
I completely agree. But it costs money. And we don't have any. It's a tricky problem and it won't go away by being ignored. Acronym-able descriptions may be the best compromise. We'll have to wait until Sara gets back from Brazil to push it further I think. S.
