Hi Bonnie -

The OGB discussed this in yesterday's meeting, and we agreed that
we want to use this email on an ongoing basis. Can you please turn
it back on?

Thank you,

Valerie

On Fri, 1 May 2009, Bonnie Corwin wrote:

> The core-contrib-discuss email is generated automatically from the 
> registration database.
>
> I think the problem with your email might be that you changed your list 
> subscriptions but not the email address in your profile which is what this 
> list would pick up.  Or if you did update your profile, it didn't get picked 
> up because the list isn't re-generated on an ongoing basis at the moment.
>
> If the OGB wants to use this list on an ongoing basis, that's fine.  In the 
> past, it has only been used at election time - hence the message. If you want 
> to use it on an ongoing basis, you just need to let the tonic-ops team know 
> that so they can set up a cron job to re-generate the list at least once a 
> day to pick up changes in status on a regular basis.
>
> Bonnie
>
> On 05/ 1/09 04:33 PM, Valerie Bubb Fenwick wrote:
>> On Fri, 1 May 2009, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>> 
>>> Valerie Bubb Fenwick wrote:
>>>> Hi gang -
>>>> 
>>>> I changed all of my mailman subscriptions to valerie.fenwick at sun.com,
>>>> but core-contrib-discuss still wants valerie.bubb at sun.com. Any idea
>>>> how to fix it?  Is this alias automatically updated, or does it require
>>>> manual intervention?
>>> The automatic rejection "feature" of the opensolaris mailing lists is a 
>>> constant annoyance for me.  I *really* wish we just used list moderation 
>>> for it.
>> 
>> It gets worse, when I corrected my email addr, I get:
>> 
>> This list is only in use during the OGB elections period. If you have a 
>> comment or question regarding OpenSolaris governance or your current 
>> contributor status, please use ogb-discuss.
>> 
>> 
>> Which is odd, as I heard a lot of discussion after the election saying
>> we really should use this alias more often. If it's intent is just for 
>> election
>> time, then I guess that's okay - but it will make notifying the core 
>> contributors
>> of upcoming constitution reviews more challenging.
>> 
>> Valerie
>
>


Reply via email to