I took an AI at the last meeting but one to go back and see where we had
got to with regards to defunct communities.

While there has been some discussion, and John Plocher has some
bugs in bugzilla about detailed reorganizations of the community, I suspect
it's easier to start over.

I went through all the communities listed

http://www.opensolaris.org/os/communities/#portal

and made the following notes. Of 48 communities, 30 appear active; the
remaining 18 are listed below.

Note that I'm basing my interpretation on the state of the community web
pages and mailing lists/fora.

Academic and Research
 - Doesn't appear to be terribly active
 - But has recent CC grants

Accessibility
 - low-level activity

Appliances
 - low level activity
 - No CC grants

Approachability
 - Forum link broken
 - Looks pretty dead to me; probably subsumed by other projects
 - All CC grants have expired

BrandZ
 - really ought to be a zones project
 - All CC grants have expired

Chinese Users
 - Forum link broken
 - Can't even find a mailing list
 - No CC grants
 - Looks pretty dead to me

CAB
 - defunct archive

Databases
 - low level activity
 - No CC grants

Emerging Platforms
 - low level activity

Fault Management
 - mid level activity
 - But new CC grants

Games
 - low level activity
 - No CC grants

HPC
 - low level activity
 - No CC grants

MDB
 - mid level activity
 - Renewed all the CC grants this year

Observability
 - low level activity
 - No CC grants

Printing
 - mid level activity
 - All CC grants expired

PowerPC
 - low level activity
 - Only one CC

SVM
 - almost defunct
 - No CC grants

UFS
 - low level activity
   (not all ufs related)
 - No CC grants

There's a certain level of opinion in the above description. I
apologise if I've mischaracterized any communities - but if I
have then those communities need to be more obviously active.

So as a possible summary, on which other may wish to comment.
(Some of these communities I've had involvement with, others not.)

Of the above, the following are possibly good

Academic and Research
Accessibility
Fault Management
MDB

whereas the following look to be candidates for removal:

Appliances (distribution related, oe JeOS?)
Approachability (definitely)
BrandZ (become a zones project?)
Chinese Users (Internationalization or advocacy?)
Databases (or get more active - or are the individual databases the
right level?)
Games
HPC
PowerPC (put into Emerging platforms?)
Printing (can't think where else to put it)
SVM (definitely)
UFS (definitely)

and the following need to get more active:

Emerging Platforms (growth area, incorporating PowerPC?)
Observability (structurally ought to be a community, but projects
  in that space like dtrace, mdb, fma, ... are strong)

-- 
-Peter Tribble
http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to