Hello!
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Peter Tribble <peter.tribble at gmail.com>wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Lynn Rohrer<Lynn.Rohrer at sun.com> wrote: > > I'm a little concerned that we're discussing removing communities > > without talking to the listed community leaders (or has this happened in > > the background?). > > > > I think many of the leaders would either support merging their content > with > > other communities > > or accept help in reinvigorating their communities. > > That's the aim; my list was a list of candidate communities that need > closer > investigation. > > Note that many of them simply aren't communities except in name - their > constitutional status is invalid. > I'm a bit confussed here...the problem is the consitutional status, or the low activity status? Were the leaders contacted? > <snip> Thanks, and best regards, -- HeCSa -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/attachments/20090717/7ebceb60/attachment.html>
