Jim Grisanzio wrote:
>>
>>
>> "o A Contributor: Anyone explicitly recognized by the Leaders of a 
>> Group as having substantially helped with the goals of a that Group. 
>> [A Contributor may be given additional rights and responsibilities, 
>> for example, to edit web pages, commit code to source repositories, 
>> help moderate associated mailing lists, etc]
>> ."
>>
>> That's the only place that web site is mentioned.
> 
> That sentence articulates an implementation concept, not an assignment 
> of constitutional rights. It's an example. The OGB discussed this during 
> the constitutional drafting process. The new constitution was designed 
> to specifically define a small set of core roles, and it was intended 
> that the apps running on the site would assign rights to those roles. 
> That's what resulted from the last OGB term.

Thanks Jim. I would still like it removed, and will work toward that
this term. I don't think website implementation needs to be part of the
OpenSolaris Constitution even if it is only mentioned in an example.

Cheers,
Jim

Reply via email to