On Dec 27, 2008, at 19:02, Stephen Lau wrote: > John Beck wrote: >> >> Plocher> Do we wish to continue with a single year-long term of >> office which >> Plocher> potentially flushes the entire board each year, or should >> we enact a >> Plocher> (staggered) 2-year term where only a subset of the board >> is up for >> Plocher> election each year? >> >> Jim> I don't feel strongly about it either way. >> >> I prefer the current system. I think it likely that some members >> will wish >> to remain at the end of each term, so the risk of total flush is >> very low. >> I also think that a 2-year commitment could be a deterrent to some >> very well >> qualified candidates, as they might want to make sure they can >> handle the >> load, as well as keep up their up personal interest, for one year >> before >> committing to a second. >> >> -- John >> >> http://blogs.sun.com/jbeck >> _______________________________________________ >> ogb-discuss mailing list >> ogb-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss >> > Ditto from me. I think if you wish to stay for a second year, and > the electorate desires it as well - then you'll be re-elected. :)
I have a slight preference for the arrangement Plocher suggests but not enough to want to debate it. S. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/attachments/20090104/fd65e044/attachment.html>
