On 04/23/09 12:57, Valerie Bubb Fenwick wrote: > On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Jim Grisanzio wrote: >> That's really the best way to look at it. And that's implied in >> section 3.1 but it should be stated explicitly in 3.3 since that >> section outlines the four roles. Some people point to 3.3 and say the >> distinction between C and CC is not that great, and they are correct >> if they read that section only. The big distinction comes when you >> back up to 3.1, and there you read that CCs are Members (which is not >> listed as a role) and they are the people who vote across the entire >> community. > That's my hope with this policy, is it will give us an opportunity to > explain what is not necessarily very clear in the constitution before > handing out the grant. I hope this will help with voter apathy :)
yes, I agree. I think your proposed policy will help focus the CC population to those most interested in voting. However, as Glynn suggested, we have to go out and communicate that policy (or whatever policy is finally approved) into the community to directly engage people. The Facilitator project may help with this, too. Jim -- http://twitter.com/jimgris
