On Jan 28, 2008 1:02 PM, James Carlson <james.d.carlson at sun.com> wrote: > Shawn Walker writes: > > Well, that's where my confusion is. I continue to see postings by > > community members that are implying that releasing a prototype, as an > > example, of a particular project is somehow "violating ARC"; which > > makes no sense to me. > > Go back and review the logs. I think you'll find that those sorts of > comments didn't necessarily come from people familiar with the > process.
Unfortunately, I don't know who is and who is not familiar with the process. However, I am heartened to know it isn't the case. I sincerely appreciate you helping me understand the process better from a high level. > Indiana hasn't undergone ARC review yet. That doesn't mean it has > "violated" anything, as far as I know. I wasn't thinking of Indiana specifically, though that could apply as well. I was thinking more of the distribution project I had mentioned in my first version of the Distribution CG proposal. Doing a "bleeding edge" release of ON is attractive me personally for testing, etc. purposes. Cheers, -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." - Robert Orben
