Simon Phipps wrote:
> The latter. The alternative is to drop point 2 and leave it to the
> OGB's discretion, but my concern there is less trusting members of the
> community may not think we have any.
I see this as
The OGB has been having a private discussion concerning
an individual member's activities; action (if any)
resulting from this topic will be brought up in a future
OGB meeting.
-or-
The OGB this last week initiated a set of discussions
with a 3rd party company concerning potential future
involvement. We hope that these discussions will
cumulate in a public announcement by that company at
some point in the future.
-or-
Sun has approached the OGB in the last week to discuss
matters that are not expected to result in formal OGB
action.
I would not expect to say things like
Sun has started discussing legal issues related to the
use of Sun's trademarks by the FooBazSolaris distro,
but we can't give details...
-John
