> I'm sorry, but I just don't get it. Not in the least bit. The issue at hand is mainly that there was a discussion initiated, including the trademark-dev list, just to have you jump into it and simply decide out of the blue that it's "OpenSolaris" and basta (well, "you" because you're the frontman for all people involved). A decision which seemed to be the opposite of what was currently being discussed on that list.
> Does it matter at all that the feedback outside this community to > the idea that we're producing a binary distribution called > OpenSolaris has almost universally been: "Duh. What took so long?" I don't think that the name "OpenSolaris" is making the big difference here. It could be called whatever else, as long it's featured and endorsed on opensolaris.org as Indiana is right now, it would have resulted in the same feedback. Whatever site I go, that's reporting about it, is still referring to it as Project Indiana. -mg -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 648 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/attachments/20071102/d3b94887/attachment.bin>
