> those same people for our trouble, and in return thinks it reasonable to > have _some_ say in how the community functions? Or is that a sign of > evil intentions? Do we have to completely abdicate to "be community"? > Isn't that taxation without representation? > > Or is all that insignificant, irrelevant? We haven't given everything, > so therefore we've given nothing? > > I'm sorry, but I just don't get it. Not in the least bit.
The community needs *much* more time to come to consensus and develop opinions re: ongoing trademark policy. Maybe 3-4x what has been available thus far? --e
