Shawn Walker wrote:
> I don't think that 100% open source should be a requirement.


For a REFERENCE platform, this makes perfect sense - if it isn't
free and reusable, nobody else could make a distro compatible with
the reference...

I expect Indiana to be made up of a/the reference platform + some special
sauce; furthermore, I expect Sun's version of it to be ref platform
+ the indiana sauce + a bunch of closed stuff (drivers...).

I also expect Schillix (et.al.) to be made up of the reference platform
+ their own special sauce (KDE instead of GNOME...)

> The distribution is merely an aggregation of software, after all...

Not "an", but a very important "compatibility reference"...

> Indiana is pretty darn close though; likely as close as we'll have for
> a little while.

The things that make Indiana different from SX are a bunch of not-yet-ARC
reviewed or approved prototypes.  That makes it difficult to commit to them
as part of a compatibility reference....

> I disagree with this for the reasons I listed above. Good work and
> drivers shouldn't be excluded as long as sufficient redistribution
> rights are available for them. We don't want to handicap ourselves
> just to be able to claim "100% open source."

We are not talking about "any distro", but rather a specially blessed
reference.

Your points all apply to those others...

   -John

Reply via email to