Rich Teer wrote: > On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Jim Grisanzio wrote: > > >> Shawn Walker wrote: >> >> >>> ..and that perhaps is the reason I fear having a distribution be >>> controlled by anything other than a community group. >>> >> Yes, I think we need a Distro CG to be home for all the distros. >> > > +1 >
I'm not sure a mega-distro CG will work. One advantage of a CG is that you inherit a governance model by which to organize, however a CG should be of singular vision for this to apply. For instance, will the core contribs of this CG vote on major changes to Belenix? Given the scope I'd think not, thus diminishing the need for such a CG. If the purpose of the CG is to bring persons of various distributions (Nexenta, Belenix, Indiana, etc) together I would think that a committee would be a much more fitting forum. Individual distros fit the CG model, but not multiple. benr.
