Keith M Wesolowski wrote: >At least half the Groups aren't structured in any useful way. > Why don't we re-structure them?
>Many >are too large and unfocused. The Groups we need most (those which >would be caretakers of releaseable artifacts, namely consolidations) >don't exist at all. Of course, Desktop could actually act like one of >those, but isn't. We could restructure it by moving its >Indiana-related activities into a different Group, but that's already >failed. I can raise motions like these every week; however, they're >clearly not going to pass, and at some point the other members will >automatically ignore me. Why be disruptive for no gain? > > If there is a genuine need to re-structure the community so it can better govern itself based on the Constitution, I'd be more than happy to contribute to that effort. Jim -- http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris
