Stephen Hahn wrote: > * Alan Burlison <Alan.Burlison at sun.com> [2007-05-31 06:29]: >> And I also dispute that the OGB actually has a mandate to impose such a >> community-wide processes without the approval of entire community, i.e. >> without a community-wide vote. > > Could you explain this assertion? 6.1 suggests that the Board is > empowered to make such processes (and that the Board or its successors > can unmake or revise them).
3.1 "Members are given the right to vote on Community-wide decisions .. Core Contributors are the Members who are given the right to vote on Community-wide decisions." You can't get much more community-wide than a decision that affects the very make-up of the community itself. The process by which projects may be admitted has a direct impact on the members of the community - both in terms of the constituency of the community and in terms of the work that is carried out by the community. It therefore seems desirable that OGB/2007/01 is approved by the entire community, and that is my request. -- Alan Burlison --
