Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote:
>
> >Casper.Dik at sun.com wrote:
> >
> >> >So let us conclude:
> >> >
> >> >- There have been no compelling arguments from the people who
> >> > filed the ARC case, proving that there is is no better way
> >> > to implement this feature.
> >>
> >> There is no need to provide such an argument.
> >
> >So the ARC commitee will approve anything without discussion?
> >This looks extremely bad.
>
>
> Do I really need to spell this out?
>
> There is no need to provide an argument that THERE IS NO BETTER WAY.
Do you know no better way than shouting?
I did explain a better way in June already.....
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
