Richard Lowe wrote: > Keith M Wesolowski <Keith.Wesolowski at sun.com> writes: > >> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:15:19AM -0700, Sriram Natarajan wrote: >> >>> Some how, I find the argument 'lawyers don't allow us to ship" not very >>> compelling considering most of the linux distributors have successfully >>> distributed vim for so long. How we are different ? , Even after so many >>> posts, this discussion will die soon (as before) and without shipping >>> basic productivity tools for a programmer like a programmer friendly >>> editor (e.g vim or emacs). >> There are a number of technical and bureaucratic challenges to solving >> this problem. To make sense of them, you have to go back and read the >> Charter and Constitution, and understand how both the development >> process and exception handling are supposed to work. I will add that >> what follows is my interpretation of the issues; other OGB members may >> believe differently (as always). >> > > [arbitrary snip] > > The C-Team(s) appear to have no formal presence on opensolaris.org, in > any way shape or form (any of them). > > I'd say that until they decide to come talk to us, they don't, for our > purposes exist as a body. If they want to retain the current process > and control they have over their respective gates, the least they need > to do is come to opensolaris.org, as a body, and function there. > > Until then, they appear to be entities used by Sun for the Solaris > product, and completely unrelated to us.
The ON C-team made overtures of moving their lists, etc. onto opensolaris.org a while ago. Mark? Miguel? Whatever happened with that? cheers, steve -- stephen lau // stevel at sun.com | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net opensolaris // solaris kernel development
