Shawn Walker wrote: > Mark Martin wrote: >> The resources that "Sun provides the community" as in the charter are >> arguably serving the community needs less and less as time progresses. >> The "community" is *clearly* not a stakeholder in determining the >> changes that the website team provides. > > I'm sorry, but that just isn't true. The whole process of selecting > xwiki, etc. was very open. I saw no significant pushback (as a whole) > over the HTML issues and so on. > bs.. I raised the objection we should have stayed update to the latest version of Jive software clearspace community and the whole migration process would have been much easier.
I saw no significant objection to that except it wasn't open source. (Jive probably did offer a free license so price should not and was not to the best of my knowledge a problem)
