Glynn, I agree that this seems awfully specific to be enshrined in the constitution. Any hope of changing it? Was does it take to ratify a constitutional amendment?
Thanks, Nick Glynn Foster wrote: > Hey, > > Nicholas Solter wrote: >> Hi Glynn, >> >> Thanks for working on this much-needed document. I sent you a few >> comments a while back that I'm not sure I see reflected here. See >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2007-July/002108.html >> >> My general point is that the constitution seems to require consensus >> voting for project instantiation and core contributor grants, while your >> wording implies that community groups have more leeway in that area. For >> example, you refer to "suggested" voting procedures, while my reading of >> the constitution is that they are required. > > Having read through the constitution, looks like you are right. I'll > try and > rewrite the effected sections (though I think this somewhat contrary to the > spirit of wanting the community groups to govern themselves). > > "Actions requiring a vote shall have a voting period of no less than > seventy-two > (72) hours." - Hooray for stop energy! ;) > > > Glynn > > _______________________________________________ > ogb-discuss mailing list > ogb-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss -- Nicholas Solter, Solaris Cluster Development http://blogs.sun.com/nsolter
