James Carlson writes: > Liane Praza writes: > > However, I'd encourage the OGB to consider adopting a sensible policy > > of allowing any core contributor to act as facilitor for a > > well-functioning community. If the OGB is unable to get a response > > That's exactly what we've been doing.
I had been reading into this discussion that this state was not a desirable one. That communities who hadn't appointed a faciliator were (minorly) delinquent. If that reading was wrong and the "no appointed facilitator" state is not just OK, but explicitly endorsed as a community operational model by the OGB, then cool. My apologies for the misunderstanding. liane
