-- 
http://www.sun.com/emrkt/sigs/6g_top.gif

Ray Strong 

Sun Microsystems, Inc.
US
Phone x49610 / +1 650 352 8438
Mobile +1 415-819-8199
Email Ray.Strong at Sun.Com


----- Original Message -----
From: Stephen Lau <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 3:27 pm
Subject: Re: [ogb-discuss] Proposal for Virtual Client Community
To: Keith M Wesolowski <Keith.Wesolowski at Sun.COM>
Cc: James Carlson <James.D.Carlson at Sun.COM>, Glynn Foster <Glynn.Foster at 
Sun.COM>, ogb-discuss at opensolaris.org, Ray.Strong at Sun.COM


> Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:22:44PM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> I doubt we'll be able to do that, as the last time we tried to do this
> >> by email or on short notice, we failed.  OGB votes require quorum.
> >>
> >> On the plus side, I'm inclined to vote for it.
> >>     
> >
> > As was I, although I'm disturbed to see additional evidence that this
> > is an item appearing on anyone's schedule or being monitored by
> > program managers.
> >
> > But, it's also partly my fault for not having written up an
> > alternative process for people in this situation.  So how about this?
> > Ray, you seem to consider your "PMT" to be significant stakeholders 
> in
> > this process.  So please invite them to join this discussion and
> > explain to us what they think about this proposal in the context of
> > the OpenSolaris Community, and why they feel it's important.  No one
> > gets to hide behind a corporate firewall and play puppeteer.
> >
> >   
> It doesn't particularly bother me.  There's nothing wrong with 
> corporates, or whatever the "PMT" is wanting to know what's going on.  
> 
> The proposed Virtual Client Community is following the rules and 
> engaging with us.  However they want to engage with whomever funds 
> their 
> development doesn't concern us as long as it isn't causing inter-CG 
> conflict, or causing the CG to violate some part of its charter with 
> the 
> rest of the OpenSolaris community and the OGB.
> 
> Besides, it could be as innocuous as Ray wanting to give a status 
> report 
> to his PMT (which, as a random aside, I never did find out what PMT 
> was 
> an acronym for) - which seems perfectly reasonable.


Our PMT (Portfolio Management Team) is essentially Jeff Jackson's staff.  I'm 
sure Bob Gianni, our Director, will be glad to attend a discussion if one is 
scheduled and we can invite Jeff.

And yes, my request was innocuous: we are presenting our status tomorrow, which 
includes progress on creating this Virtual Client Community.

... Ray

> 
> cheers,
> steve
> 
> -- 
> stephen lau | stevel at opensolaris.org | www.whacked.net
> 

Reply via email to