Eric Boutilier wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Stephen Lau wrote: >> Eric Boutilier wrote: >>> I think part of the problem is not enough people know about >>> the community reorg plan: >>> >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ogb-discuss/2007-April/000356.html >>> >>> One of the proposed new Community Groups is a Reliability, Availability, >>> and Serviceability Group, which might be a good fit for an HA Cluster >>> project, but Nicholas might not have known about it. >>> >>> Eric >> >> That proposal was pretty much shot down by enough community groups that >> we should toss it. > > :-( That's a shame. > > So it's not even worth trying to take what's still intact and getting the > nay-sayers to step up and suggest ways to improve on it? Or are you saying > it was basically shredded. From what I could tell it seemed like a > *really* good start, to say the least.
Well part of the proposal was formed from the idea of trying to have uniform classifications for communities, which goes to heck if we have exceptions. :) I don't mind, it was a useful exercise, and points out that we should aim for smaller bites rather than one huge chunk. ;-) cheers, steve -- stephen lau // stevel at sun.com | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net opensolaris // solaris kernel development
