On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Stephen Lau wrote: > In reference to Alan Burlison's post from last Thursday: > http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss/2007-May/030537.html > > It does seem to be somewhat conflicting that section 6.1 states that the OGB > has the power to manage the business and affairs of the OpenSolaris > Community, while section 3.1 states that Members have the right to vote on > Community-wide decisions. > > Alan's post was in reference to the new project instantiation policy the OGB > approved as OGB/2007/001. > > Should the policy be put in place based on the OGB vote of approval? Or > should it be put to a community-wide vote?
I fear that community-wide vote on this would be overkill and would set a troubling precedent. Instead, I like the idea of coming up with a better way to ensure wider review during the discussion phase. Eric > > The bigger issue is: Alan is right, we do need a clearer demarcation of what > the OGB has the responsibility to do, and what needs approval from the larger > community. > > cheers, > steve > -- > stephen lau // stevel at sun.com | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net > opensolaris // solaris kernel development > _______________________________________________ > ogb-discuss mailing list > ogb-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ogb-discuss >
