Darren.Reed at Sun.COM writes: > Now if the response of the OGB is to say "advocacy, go and > look at this and come back with a plan", great, but so far
If you want a formal response from the OGB, we'll have to discuss it during our next meeting. None of us can (or should) provide an answer on behalf of the OGB. However, if you want an answer with my OGB hat on, I agree completely with Keith. This isn't an OGB issue at all, because it's not a governance issue. Instead, it's been suggested multiple times that the right thing to do would be for _you_ to approach the new advocacy community and ask your questions (or make your demands) there. If you'd like a delayed answer, and we're forced to talk about this on Wednesday, then I'll say the same thing there. Darren.Reed at Sun.COM writes: > The model that I envisage of how it should work is: > - ogb asks advocacy to go and do this Why does the OGB have to do this at all? You seem to have the issue in hand, so why aren't you running with it? > In other words, the advocacy group does all of the "hard work" > but it should still need to be ratified by the OGB. We frankly don't know what "it" is in this case, and thus can't determine whether it does in fact need to be ratified by anyone, including the OGB. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
