Stephen Hahn wrote: > * Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith at Sun.COM> [2007-12-12 22:56]: >> >From a quick scan of the webpages for those communities, it seems all but >> >one >> are meeting the other prime requirement - that of having a public discussion >> forum. The sole exception is the OS/Net community, which will need to set >> up >> a forum ASAP in order to have a place to discuss any further Core Contributor >> grants for it. > > I want to confirm that, since most ON general technical discussion is > taking place on opensolaris-code, opensolaris-code is seen as *not* > meeting the requirement of a CG's public forum (so I can help the Core > Contributors of ON meet this requirement). Right?
If the ON Core Contributors wanted to name it as their discussion forum, and both reduce its scope from all OpenSolaris to just ON, and add OS/Net community governance to its scope, that's a proposal we could discuss, since I believe opensolaris-code is not owned by any community at the moment. The requirement I see is that someone wanting to request Core Contributor status, or nominate another for Core Contributor, or propose a project for the OS/Net community, be able to find a designated mailing list and/or web forum listed on <http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/on/> . -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
