Ghee Teo <Ghee.Teo at Sun.COM> wrote:
> > It is just another chance to verify that there is collaboration on
> > OpenSolaris
> > and not just ignorant domination from Sun.....
> >
> Let not argue your case by calling us ignorant! The point is
> imagemagik is integrated.
> It is not against any ARC rule in name space assignment. If indeed you
> have submitted an ARC
> earlier with the intention to integrate, ARC will definitely advise
> against the imagemagik case
> to rename or some sort.
> > Do we have an OpenSolaris community or is this just a fake?
> >
> What response might you get if you make the same proposal to other
> Linux community
> like ubuntu or fedora? Suggesting to them I have this 20 years old
> binary, however, it does
> not run in your distro, but I like to reserve the name. Do you think
> this is reasonable?
You forget the most important result from the ARC discussion:
If there is a name collision the cannot be resolved, the name cannot be used
in /usr/bin.
Current Solaris express is in conflict with ARC decisions.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
