In a message dated 7/31/03 1:54:57 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


<<you have a duty to mitigate your damages and not put anything at risk by making a declaration that is outside the clear elements of the license or clearly protected by existing copyright law.

>>

I would argue that there is no "clarity" with regards to PI ownership in the license.

I agree as a matter of common sense, rather than as a matter of law, that you shouldn't expect to protect anything that you can't already claim copyright or trademark protections on in case a court should decide to reform the license by striking otherwise unprotectable types of PI from the PI list.

Lee

Reply via email to