> Nothing in the license says "Legally defensible". It merely requires > "ownership" of the PI. And since many of the items on the list look like they can't > be owned either under trademark or copyright law, what "ownership" means is > horribly vague in terms of the license.
This is my point. You can send out a C&D all you like. In fact, there's nothing to stop you for sending out a C&D to anyone. All you have to do is go through the actions. I could send you a C&D right now. The point being whether or not a C&D is worth the paper it's printed on. If the PI claim isn't defendable, feel free to send me all the C&Ds you like -- I'll be sure to thank you for providing me with a means to start my fireplace. Steven "Conan" Trustrum Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.trustrum.com "The only real people are the people that never existed" -- Oscar Wilde _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
