At 11:00 -0500 12/17/03, Damian wrote:
From: "Leroy Van Camp III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  From what I can tell, Monte Cook doesn't actually seem to like his
 stuff to be OGC. A number of his books have frustrating and vague open
 content declarations.

He hasn't been able to shake the, "But I'm a D&D designer I can do what I want!" mindset And Wizards pretty much lets him get away with it. Although I think he got burned on the Illithid deal.

nah, it's just par for the course--IME *most* OGC, and especially PI, declarations are about of that caliber. And a rather large portion of the creators only make OGC as much as they feel they have to--the only difference here is the choice to (perhaps) claim all OGC element names as PI, rather than just the unique ones.
--
woodelf <*>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://webpages.charter.net/woodelph/


There once was a young girl from Gwent,
Who was trying to put up a tent.
   She banged at the peg,
   It went straight through her leg,
And right after that happened she went
("AAaargh!")
    --John Hegley
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

Reply via email to