On Wednesday 18 February 2004 03:15 pm, Mark Clover wrote: > ...where that PI is valid, yes. The crux of my debate is in regard to the > nature of PI and its potential to be invalid on the basis of being > "Derivative Material" which I believe trumps a declaration of PI and > renders that declaration invalid.
Spell names are not of significant length to be eligible for copyright protection and therefore cannot be "derivative works" under the definition in the OGL. -Damian _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
