----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 3:05 AM
<snip>
 
And, while I didn't check the front cover of Dragon, I kept seeing M&M ads and other stuff that were OGL covered while the magazine itself didn't seem to be OGL covered.
<snip>
 
 
Don't forget that WotC is allowed to give people permission to do things that they are not allowed to do by the OGL (or the d20stl). I believe that Dragon magazine used to be owned by TSR (as well as another one called Dungeon). I don't know if WotC have kept this as in-house or got someone else to franchise the name (like they have with Ravenloft) but the Players Handbook that I have has caries an advert for Dragon in the back that says it is the official magazine.
 
WotC could easily allow Dragon to publish both OGC and reviews containing words that are prohibited by the OGL in separate articles. As far as I know Dragon wouldn't
be legally bound to inform the world that they had been granted extra privileges *if* WotC gave them some.
 
WotC have made other agreements with people that let them do things not allowed by the OGL or d20stl. If you look at their website you will see official fansites for all the campaign settings TSR sold that they have dropped. I'm fairly sure that some people would say these websites would be illegal if they didn't have special permission.
 
David S
_______________________________________________
Ogf-l mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l

Reply via email to