Kal Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do not think you are criticizing what I said. I think people
> should have to enter into an agreement if they want to associate
> with someones trademark. I fully understand why a company would
> not want to be misrepresented much like I do not appreciate being
> misrepresented. I just think we should avoid WotC only agendas
> in the OGL. I'd rather see some other mechanism added to the
> D20STL to address such issues.
Kal, I think we've degenerated from discussion to politics and semantics.
Neither of us think we should be able to use trademarks. You see WotC-legal's
change to the OGL as a WotC-only move. I see it as a general move. (I don't
see ANYTHING in the OGL as WotC-only, even if they DO want it.)
DM
Looking for a game? I DM in Upstate NY, twice a month in New Hartford, NY (a
suburb of Utica)
Even better, I've got irregular games where I live, in Charlton (near Albany).
Drop me a line and we'll game!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM: PlanesdragonDM ICQ: 26106342
____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at
http://webmail.netscape.com.
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
