> I see some problems with this, though, in how it interacts with Section 7 in
> regards to use of trademarks without permission. If my OGC contains my
> trademarks which cannot be used without my permission, is the content really
> open? So perhaps there's no real answer short of cumbersome, dense prose.
As a suggestion for affirmiatvly claiming trademarks as closed / proprietary,
why not include a reccommended replacement for them?
As an example: "The phrase "The Craft of the Mind" is hereby claimed as a
proprietary trademark in this work, and is expressly identified as not open
gaming content. [insert permission notice here] For use of the open gaming
content from this work without the proprietary trademark, a replacement of
"psionics" is suggested for "The Craft of the Mind."
DM
-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org
