on 10/13/01 7:15 AM, Richard Stewart at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The question I guess I am asking then....Would you stand behind it? Is > there anyone out there that would? > > The D20 has never garaunteed quality or compatibilty and we see a GOOD > ammount of crap with that jazzy D20 logo on it. > > Richard Stewart > Sanguine Productions Ltd.
Would we stand behind an open gaming logo? I suppose we would, but is it really necessary? My point being is that we already have the d20 logo so what makes an OGL logo any different? It seems to just muddy the waters and dilute an already diluted market. However, if there was a standard set up that set d20 content apart from OGL content I'd think you'd have a better sell. That is why I suggested the mandatory 25% open gaming content to use the logo. Now the logo stands for something. That has value to us. Another logo that means the same thing as d20 honestly doesn't. Maybe I'm not getting you here and if I'm not pardon please pardon my ignorance. -- Jeffrey J. Visgaitis Inner Circle Games http://www.icirclegames.com _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
