on 1/30/03 3:48 PM, sigfried trent at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Take the Netbook of Feats for example (my project) > > We list each author and then a list of their feats in the section 15 > like this... > Brendan Quinn (Author); Accurate Attack, Fearsome Display, Flashy Attack > > Each feat also has a coppyright line in the feat itself, like this... > COPYRIGHT 2001, Carl Cram�r > > This gives us a huge section 15 because we wanted authors to be > identified for their work if it was used elsewhere. I now realise this > is probably not realistic. > > It would be better if we list each author on their own line with a > coppyright date in the section 15, like this... > Carl Cram�r, Copyright 2001 > > When someone wants to use a feat they could look at the coppyright line > with the feat itself and determine which section 15 lines they should > include if they want to use it. That way they could avoid including our > entire section 15. And if they did include the entire thing it wouldn't > be quite so long. > > Sigfried Trent > Team leader: Netbook of Feats > FanCC: Compliance Advisor > > _______________________________________________ > Ogf-l mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
This is what we have done in the Netbook of Classes all along, but from what I am hearing here, people using just one class would have to include the entire section 15, relevant or not. If this is the case, then as a publisher I would contact the NBoC to contact the author and get them to give me a 1-class only separate release of their class, as has been described by others on this list. And of course, we at the NBoC would cooperate fully in this. _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
