I'd say no. I have no comment on Mongoose's declarations of OGC except that I do not buy their book because of the vagueness. And anyone else who uses less than explicit declarations, I pass them by as well. If you want to guarentee I don't buy your books, go ahead and be vague.
Who am I? A potential reuser. A potential customer. It's your choice. Joe --- Faustus von Goethe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >But I think Mr HUDarklord was being a bit harsh with Mongoose. > ... > >Sure their declaration is a tad on the lazy side ... > > I am continuing to take discussion such as this and the lack of > reaction > from the community to mean that the designation "everything that is > derivative of alreadyb open content" is becoming accepted industry > standard. > > Is that the case? > > Faust > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus > > _______________________________________________ > Ogf-l mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l > > > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
