* Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <jef...@josefsipek.net> [2011-10-03 22:37]: > On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 10:17:57PM +0200, Guido Berhoerster wrote: > > * Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <jef...@josefsipek.net> [2011-10-02 02:59]: > > > Any issues with merging this? > > > > > > http://hg.31bits.net/oi/oi-build-bdb/rev/ecc62b981eb7 > > > > > > (https://www.illumos.org/issues/1262) > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > bdb 4.8.30 is currently delivered by oi-sfe, the specfile seems > > to be maintained at SFE and already provides 5.2.36. > > Bayard made a good point, one will generally want multiple versions of bdb. > Thoughts about having bdb-4.8 (and bdb-5.2)?
I'll leave that open to discussion, I just want to point out that the convention is to use integers in package names i.e. bdb-48 and bdb-52. Also the documentation should be delivered into /usr/share/doc/<package> and not /usr/docs. Docs for bindings we do not offer such as csharp should probably be deleted (the SFE package should also not include that). -- Guido Berhoerster _______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev