On May 12, 2013, at 9:05 AM, Magnus <mag...@yonderway.com> wrote:
>
> On May 12, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Jim Klimov wrote:
>>
>>
>> I believe, 32-bit should be retained. While it is of little utility
>> for ZFS and other huge-RAM jobs, it may be required for some netbooks,
>> older hardware repurposed for tests and SOHO servers, as well as for
>> resource-constrained testing VMs. So I'd vouch for this fork/patch
>> approach if this upstream is still followed.
>
> Not to mention intriguing projects like
> http://wiki.illumos.org/display/illumos/Raspberry+Pi+Bring-Up
>
ARM11 is only 32-bit, and has nothing to do with the discussion of whether we
would retain *x86* 32-bit mode support.
- Garrett
> _______________________________________________
> oi-dev mailing list
> oi-dev@openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
_______________________________________________
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
