Fixing illumos sounds like the right answer. Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 3, 2013, at 7:40 AM, Andrzej Szeszo <asze...@gmail.com> wrote: > My cheeky plan was to get someone to "fix" the headers in illumos itself. > > Alternative is to ignore the issue and include the fixed-includes > contents in the gcc package. > > Alexander, feel free to add "fixed-includes" to the gcc package. My > initial gcc package is getting rid of the directory in the Makefile > altogether. > > We can look at fixing illumos headers at later time. > > Andrzej > > On 3 June 2013 15:56, Alexander Pyhalov <a...@rsu.ru> wrote: >> On 06/03/2013 17:46, Alexander Pyhalov wrote: >>> >>> Hello, everyone... >>> Maybe I'm wrong, but, for example, OpenCSW gcc 4.8 package contains a >>> big set of fixed includes. Why doesn't our g++ 4.7 package include any? >> >> >> Compare, for example, >> http://pkg.omniti.com/omnios/release/manifest/0/developer%2Fgcc47%404.7.2%2C5.11-0.151006%3A20130429T221114Z >> and >> http://pkg.openindiana.org/hipster/manifest/0/developer%2Fgcc-47%404.7.3%2C5.11-0.151.1.8.1%3A20130518T182047Z >> . >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Alexander Pyhalov, >> system administrator of Computer Center of Southern Federal University >> >> _______________________________________________ >> oi-dev mailing list >> oi-dev@openindiana.org >> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev > > _______________________________________________ > oi-dev mailing list > oi-dev@openindiana.org > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev _______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev