On 18.07.2016 23:35, Adam Števko wrote:
Please compose your thoughts and comment with as few replies as
necessary so the community may solidify the final text of this document.
Cheers,
Adam
Hi Adam, Hi Nikola
Thanks both of you for the work put into this.
Here are my thought and comments:
When reading Adams text it refers to a body of Leadership. Both source
Projects (FreeBSD and FiFo) have such a Role defined. Do we have that?
Adams text is more worded towards being a set of rules. Nikolas more in
the sense of expectations. I prefer expectations.
When I read the words "will not be tolerated" it imediatly raises the
question what will hapen if i break those? Who punishes and how? In my
opinion "Discouraged behaviour" is the better wording.
I prefer the managing misuse and escalation section over the reporting
violations. We have a very friendly community. There should not be a
need to involve a third party to resolve issues from the very beginning.
The very notion of twitter is that everything is public.
I find the point "Maintain welcoming environment for new contributors
and guide them in contributions." very important. I would like to have
that in.
What is the desired outcome of a code of conduct? Should it be a set of
rules? Or a set of expectations from each other? Is it assumed to be the
same for all codes of conducts? If so should we link to that definition?
or do we need to define that?
Greetings
Till
_______________________________________________
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
