On 09/28/18 10:41 AM, Alexander Pyhalov via oi-dev wrote:
Hi, folks.
We are approaching October. While I have limited time now, I want to
coordinate priorities and targets, what should we do till end of
October (and due to personal reasons, I'd better announce snapshot
till 20 October or earlier or allow someone else to do this).
We have several regressions and problems, which would be good to
fix.
1) Virtualbox failure after FPU changes
https://www.illumos.org/issues/9761 ,
https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/17947 is a serious one, but I'm
afraid I lack skills to fix it in reasonable time. The stack trace
itself doesn't seem related to illumos-gate changes, but likely it
is. In KVM Joyent fixed this using new hma_fpu_* API, but Virtualbox
structures to store VM registers differ and from brief overlook it
has several asm functions to store/restore Host/Base registers state.
So far I don't have an idea how convert one to another. So, this
likely will be broken in 2018.10 unless someone skillful dig into
this.
2) sbcl issues - threaded sbcl can not be built after KPTI changes,
it fails FLOCK and posix tests. Needs investigation. It's a serious
issue, because threaded sbcl is needed to build pgloader.
3) Our Mate is a bit old, but newer Mate requires updated GTK3 .
Updated GTK3 IIRC has dropped support for theme engines, and so our
Nimbus theme based on unico engine doesn't work. Also I've heard
there were issues with new mate-terminal. Michal, do you have some
comments here?
I run MATE 1.20 as seen in the PR and it works fine but:
(1) Nimbus theme. I stick to "Traditional" theme.
(2) Pluma text editor's text area blinks annoyingly. Might be an
Intel-only issue. Upstream issue reported.
(3) MATE Terminal requires new vte library which does not work for us.
From my investigation I noticed that some #ifdef __sun were removed
from newer vte. Also I haven't seen new vte for non-Linux OS (pkgsrc,
BSDs, ...).
I don't think I am able to do anything about those.
4) As for new features, I really want to see KVM zones, perhaps, I'll
dig into this shortly.
Does somebody have another targets/comments?
I will work on openQA tests for them to be in shape for the snapshot and
test the images once test-snapshot is available.
Also I had some progress with Meson but can't promise this.
Michal
Please, avoid turning this topic in bike-shedding, I want to hear OI
developers in a way "I ll take item #N" or "I expect to finish
feature A before snapshot", not "please, also fix this and that".
Best regards, Alexander Pyhalov, system administrator of Southern
Federal University IT department
_______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
_______________________________________________
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev