Am 22.02.21 um 13:38 schrieb Klaus Ziegler - owner of sunfreeware.de:
Hi,
is there any reason why we don't provide cc1objplus compiler in gcc
builds?
Most probably because nobody uses it and if we merge it into OI Hipster
we will have to support it.
Thus, additional work and not much gain.
--- Makefile.orig 2021-02-21 21:09:30.515646158 +0000
+++ Makefile 2021-02-21 21:17:44.199125768 +0000
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
CONFIGURE_OPTIONS+= --enable-plugins
CONFIGURE_OPTIONS+= --enable-objc-gc
CONFIGURE_OPTIONS.i386+= --enable-initfini-array
-CONFIGURE_OPTIONS+= --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto,objc
+CONFIGURE_OPTIONS+= --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto,objc,obj-c++
CONFIGURE_OPTIONS+= --disable-libitm
CONFIGURE_OPTIONS+= enable_frame_pointer=yes
maybe just forgotten? however including it does not harm at all,
and the tests for it also work fine:
=== obj-c++ tests ===
Running target unix/-m64
=== obj-c++ Summary for unix/-m64 ===
# of expected passes 1451
# of expected failures 10
# of unsupported tests 77
Running target unix/-m64/-msave-args
=== obj-c++ Summary for unix/-m64/-msave-args ===
# of expected passes 1451
# of expected failures 10
# of unsupported tests 77
=== obj-c++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 2902
# of expected failures 20
# of unsupported tests 154
Much Regards
Klaus
_______________________________________________
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
_______________________________________________
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
