Good idea. We're only a few weeks from branching OIIO 1.1 officially. Would it suffice for now to tag the current trunk (which is at this moment fairly stable) as 1.1 beta 1, with the understanding that as a beta (rather than a true release branch) it is subject to further API and ABI changes? But at least it will have a tag that designates the minimal version of OIIO that should be used with OSL?
On Sep 4, 2012, at 5:16 PM, Thomas Dinges wrote: > Hi, > Now that OSL 1.2 is here, it would be good to have a stable OIIO tag too. For > some people it's not clear that they have to use trunk, because from some > reports I got OSL does not compile against the older OIIO 1.0.x branch > anymore. I don't know the current status of OIIO, maybe you would like to fix > some things still, but a stable tag with all the new features since 1.0.x > would be appreciated. We (Blender) also rely on the utf8 windows fixes which > are in trunk, so it's not only about OSL. > > Best regards, > Thomas Dinges > _______________________________________________ > Oiio-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org -- Larry Gritz [email protected] _______________________________________________ Oiio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
