Doesn’t the CMake snippet below indicate that OIIO is built with VS2017?  And 
are you passing C++17 to the OIIO build as that’s in the command line option 
for the module being built. 

> On Apr 24, 2019, at 5:59 PM, Larry Gritz <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> That's interesting. Definitely makes me think it's some kind of mismatch 
> between your module and OIIO, since the all-OIIO code (using oiiotool, which 
> calls the same libOpenImageIO APIs underneath) seems fine.
> 
> Are you sure that OIIO and your code was definitely built with the same 
> compiler version? Same flags indicating the C++ standard to use or any other 
> such things that may be relevant for MSVS?
> 
> What I would recommend next is trying to find the *minimal* 
> separately-compiled program that exhibits the problem. Eliminate your testing 
> framework and all other cruft. Would the following truly minimal program also 
> fail?
> 
> #include <OpenImageIO/imageio.h>
> int main (int argc, char *argv[]);
> {
>     const char* filename = 
> "C:\sensomovie\C200\A011C118_19041345_CANON\A011C118_19041345_CANON_00000001.DPX"
>     auto in = ImageInput::open(filename);
>     if (in) {
>         printf ("Opened successfully\n");
>         printf ("Opened successfully, format is %s\n", in->format_name());
>     } else {
>         printf ("Fail\n");
>         return 1;
>     }
>     return 0;
> }
> 
> 
>> On Apr 24, 2019, at 2:27 PM, Mathieu Prevot <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> No, it only crashes when I use the API in release, I use the API in debug it 
>> works too. The output:
>> 
>> .\oiiotool.exe -info -v 
>> C:\sensomovie\C200\A011C118_19041345_CANON\A011C118_19041345_CANON_00000001.
>> DPX
>> Reading 
>> C:\sensomovie\C200\A011C118_19041345_CANON\A011C118_19041345_CANON_00000001.DPX
>> C:\sensomovie\C200\A011C118_19041345_CANON\A011C118_19041345_CANON_00000001.DPX
>>  : 4096 x 2160, 3 channel, uint10 dpx
>>     channel list: R, G, B
>>     DateTime: "2019:04:13 16:14:30"
>>     Orientation: 1 (normal)
>>     PixelAspectRatio: 1
>>     Software: "CANON"
>>     dpx:Colorimetric: "Unspecified video"
>>     dpx:DittoKey: 1
>>     dpx:EndOfImagePadding: 0
>>     dpx:EndOfLinePadding: 0
>>     dpx:FramePosition: 1
>>     dpx:FrameRate: 59.9401
>>     dpx:HeldCount: 1
>>     dpx:ImageDescriptor: "RGB"
>>     dpx:InputDeviceSerialNumber: "373449900026"
>>     dpx:Interlace: 0
>>     dpx:Packing: "Filled, method A"
>>     dpx:SequenceLength: 2931
>>     dpx:ShutterAngle: 0
>>     dpx:SourceDateTime: "2019:04:13 16:14:30"
>>     dpx:SourceImageFileName: "A011C118_19041345_CANON.CRM"
>>     dpx:TemporalFrameRate: 59.9401
>>     dpx:TimeCode: "00:42:11;23"
>>     dpx:Transfer: "Unspecified video"
>>     dpx:UserBits: 0
>>     dpx:UserData: 67, 65, 78, 79, 78, 95, 82, 65, 87, 95, 68, 69, 86, 69, 
>> 76, 79, ... [63488 x uint8]
>>     dpx:Version: "V2.0"
>>     oiio:BitsPerSample: 10
>>     smpte:TimeCode: 00:42:11:23
>> 
>> Mathieu
>> 
>> Le mer. 24 avr. 2019 à 23:24, Larry Gritz <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
>> Matthieu, can you confirm:
>> 
>> * Does `oiiotool -info -v yourfile.dpx` also crash (with the same filename 
>> as you used before, of course)? Or does it only crash when the OIIO API 
>> calls are made from your program?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Apr 24, 2019, at 1:51 PM, Mathieu Prevot <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello. Many thanks Till for your previous posts and proposition.
>>> 
>>> I'm curious to know if the problems can be reproduced.
>>> Here are the binaries of oiio, openexr and few dependencies, as well as 
>>> their source and the powershell script I use to configure/build/install 
>>> those libraries.
>>> There is also the oiioTest project which I use to open the DPX 10bits image.
>>> The debug and release configuration are those I used to far. The debug 
>>> should work and the release should trigger the memory exception, at least 
>>> certainly when you ask to inline whenever possible.
>>> I'm using boost 1.70, the available for download binaries. Everything in 
>>> x64.
>>> 
>>> https://1drv.ms/f/s!AlUmbfQiLoTZhFUTthzeUkWoB3rc 
>>> <https://1drv.ms/f/s!AlUmbfQiLoTZhFUTthzeUkWoB3rc>
>>> 
>>> I built the libraries with the v141 toolset (the latest that comes with 
>>> VS2017; it also comes with VS2019).
>>> I built the oiioTest with v142 as well as  v141, and I observed the same 
>>> result in both cases.
>>> I'll do them again to be certain.
>>> I'll try Larry's patches to get to know more, and then post here again.
>>> 
>>> I'll also try Till's binaries, but I can tell already that those binaries 
>>> are missing:
>>> RAW_R.DLL (?)
>>> BOOST_FILESYSTEM-VC141-MT-X64-1_66.DLL (no problem to get those boost 
>>> libraries)
>>> BOOST_THREAD-VC141-MT-X64-1_66.DLL
>>> LZMA.DLL (?)
>>> Maybe a script would be easier to use than binaries.
>>> 
>>> M
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Le mer. 24 avr. 2019 à 20:30, till dechent <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
>>> My guess would be that VS2019 being the problem is unlikely since Mathieu 
>>> also tried with the vs141 toolset.
>>> 
>>> To narrow things down between a compile issue and a code issue you could 
>>> grab my binaries and see if your code works with them: 
>>> https://github.com/ttddee/oiio-msvc2017 
>>> <https://github.com/ttddee/oiio-msvc2017>
>>> 
>>> Or maybe try a build without the command line and go straight from CMake to 
>>> Visual Studio to compile from there.
>>> 
>>> I have a Windows machine here so if you need me to try anything, happy to 
>>> help!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Am Mi., 24. Apr. 2019 um 18:41 Uhr schrieb Larry Gritz <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>> I'm sorry to ask you to be my debugging robot, but since I can't seem to 
>>> reproduce on my end...
>>> 
>>> 
>>> So let's try another thing. At the call site,
>>> 
>>>     std::cout << "reading (float) file: " << filename << "\n";
>>>     string filename2 = filename;
>>>     std::cout << "filename2 addr = " << (void*)&filename2 << std::endl;
>>>     std::cout << "filename2 len = " << filename2.size() << std::endl;
>>>     std::cout << "filename2 = '" << filename2 << "'\n";
>>>     auto in = ImageInput::open(filename2);
>>> 
>>> And inside get_rest_arguments:
>>> 
>>> bool
>>> Strutil::get_rest_arguments(const std::string& str, std::string& base,
>>>                             std::map<std::string, std::string>& result)
>>> {
>>>     std::cout << "str addr = " << (void*)&str << std::endl;
>>>     std::cout << "str len " << str.size() << std::endl;
>>>     std::cout << "str chars = '" << str << "'" << std::endl;
>>>     std::string::size_type mark_pos = str.find_first_of("?");
>>>     std::cout << "result of find_first_of is " << mark_pos << std::endl;
>>>     ... rest of function as before ...
>>> 
>>> So I'm just trying to establish that we're really getting a reference to 
>>> the same string we thing we were passing, and also whether any access to 
>>> str (including the length) is problematic, or just accessing the characters.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Now, I have one other hypothesis in the back of my mind. You said you were 
>>> using VS2019. I know that people have been using 2015 and 2017, but I'm 
>>> wondering if 2019 is the issue here. In particular, is there any chance 
>>> that VS2019 has changed the representation of std::string (akin to how gcc 
>>> changed its std::string representation in the ~gcc5 time frame)? And 
>>> perhaps is it possible that OIIO's dll itself was compiled with one string 
>>> representation but your program (separate compilation unit) used an 
>>> incompatible one, so that you are passing what you think is a reference to 
>>> a std::string but the OIIO code it's calling has a different idea of the 
>>> internal layout of a std::string?
>>> 
>>> Or is there any other way that the caller and callee (which are in 
>>> different compilation units and different dlls) might have a different idea 
>>> of what a std::string means? 
>>> 
>>> Ring any bells for anyone?
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Apr 24, 2019, at 1:22 AM, Mathieu Prevot <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, there might be something wrong in my locales, `str` could not be read 
>>>> ( "error reading characters of string" , in my previous post) and 
>>>> `filename` was undefined.
>>>> However, that's not necessarily the problem, the memory is allocated and I 
>>>> have the same size as in debug (79 characters).
>>>> Before ImageInput::open, I print filename to stdout, and I see a correct 
>>>> result.
>>>> 
>>>>     cout << "reading (float) file: " << filename;
>>>>     auto in = ImageInput::open(filename);
>>>> 
>>>> The right way to be able to read filename is to make a local copy; also I 
>>>> make certain that I got the correct type (string), even though string has 
>>>> a default constructor from const char.
>>>> 
>>>>     cout << "reading (float) file: " << filename;
>>>>     string filename2 = filename;
>>>>     auto in = ImageInput::open(filename2);
>>>> 
>>>> It might be related to the character set, but I don't think since it did 
>>>> not change from debug to release.
>>>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9349342/about-the-character-set-option-in-visual-studio
>>>>  
>>>> <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9349342/about-the-character-set-option-in-visual-studio>
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> In order to acertain this, I did set the character set to "not set" and 
>>>> tried also "unicode", but I stil got the same memory error.
>>>> Here the compile command with "not set" ( /D "_UNICODE" /D "UNICODE"  are 
>>>> removed):
>>>> 
>>>> /permissive- /Yu"pch.h" /GS /GL /W3 /Gy /Zc:wchar_t 
>>>> /I"c:\lib\tiff\include" /I"c:\lib\openexr\include" /I"c:\lib\oiio\include" 
>>>> /Zi /Gm- /O2 /sdl /Fd"x64\Release\vc142.pdb" /Zc:inline /fp:precise /D 
>>>> "NDEBUG" /D "_CONSOLE" /errorReport:prompt /WX- /Zc:forScope /Gd /Oi /MD 
>>>> /std:c++17 /FC /Fa"x64\Release\" /EHsc /nologo /Fo"x64\Release\" 
>>>> /Fp"x64\Release\oiioTest.pch" /diagnostics:classic 
>>>> 
>>>> `auto` was `const char*`, therefore did not change a thing.
>>>> 
>>>> With the new lines you suggested, the memory error happens at the first 
>>>> str usage, ie., str.size().
>>>> 
>>>>   std::cout << "str len " << str.size() << " = '" << str << "'" << 
>>>> std::endl; // memory error here
>>>>   std::string::size_type mark_pos = str.find_first_of("?");
>>>>   std::cout << "result of find_first_of is " << mark_pos << std::endl;
>>>> 
>>>> I tried the local copy with:
>>>> 
>>>>     std::string str2 = str; // memory error here
>>>>     std::string::size_type mark_pos2 = str2.find_first_of("?");
>>>>     std::string::size_type mark_pos = str.find_first_of("?");
>>>> 
>>>> The memory error happens at the str2 affectation; str has size 79 
>>>> (expected), and cannot be read, str2 has size 0, allocated 0.
>>>> 
>>>> Not sure where to go next.
>>>> Mathieu
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Le mer. 24 avr. 2019 à 08:26, Larry Gritz <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
>>>> Do you know what your "locale" is? Anything unusual?
>>>> 
>>>> I'm also wondering about the /D "_UNICODE" /D "UNICODE" 
>>>> What happens if you don't do that?
>>>> 
>>>> Your line,
>>>>>   auto path = 
>>>>> "C:/sensomovie/C200/A011C118_19041345_CANON/A011C118_19041345_CANON_00001926.DPX";
>>>> 
>>>> I wonder if you instead used
>>>> 
>>>>     const char* path = 
>>>> "C:/sensomovie/C200/A011C118_19041345_CANON/A011C118_19041345_CANON_00001926.DPX";
>>>> 
>>>> if that changes anything?
>>>> 
>>>> The other idea I had is in get_rest_arguments (src/libutil/strutil.cpp), 
>>>> could you instrument it like this just to see what happens:
>>>> 
>>>> bool
>>>> Strutil::get_rest_arguments(const std::string& str, std::string& base,
>>>>                             std::map<std::string, std::string>& result)
>>>> {
>>>>     std::cout << "str len " << str.size() << " = '" << str << "'" << 
>>>> std::endl;
>>>>     std::string::size_type mark_pos = str.find_first_of("?");
>>>>     std::cout << "result of find_first_of is " << mark_pos << std::endl;
>>>>     ... rest of function as before ...
>>>> 
>>>> and see if there is anything interesting printed immediately prior to the 
>>>> crash?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 23, 2019, at 2:53 PM, Mathieu Prevot <[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I use a debug oiio, and release project; in that case I managed to get a 
>>>>> call stack.
>>>>> 
>>>>> `str` in `bool Strutil::get_rest_arguments(const std::string& str, 
>>>>> std::string& base, std::map<std::string, std::string>& result)`
>>>>> has a problem ("error reading characters of string").
>>>>> 
>>>>>      OpenImageIO.dll!OpenImageIO_v2_1::Strutil::get_rest_arguments(const 
>>>>> std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char> > & 
>>>>> str, std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char> > 
>>>>> & base, 
>>>>> std::map<std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>
>>>>>  >,std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char> 
>>>>> >,std::less<std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>
>>>>>  > 
>>>>> >,std::allocator<std::pair<std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>
>>>>>  > const 
>>>>> ,std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char> > > > 
>>>>> > & result) Line 270    C++
>>>>> 
>>>>>      OpenImageIO.dll!OpenImageIO_v2_1::ImageInput::create(const 
>>>>> std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char> > & 
>>>>> filename, bool do_open, const OpenImageIO_v2_1::ImageSpec * config, 
>>>>> OpenImageIO_v2_1::string_view plugin_searchpath) Line 512    C++
>>>>> 
>>>>>      OpenImageIO.dll!OpenImageIO_v2_1::ImageInput::open(const 
>>>>> std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char> > & 
>>>>> filename, const OpenImageIO_v2_1::ImageSpec * config) Line 106    C++
>>>>> >    oiioTest.exe!DPXio::ReadFloat(char *) Line 31    C++
>>>>> 
>>>>> Here my function:
>>>>> 
>>>>> auto DPXio::ReadFloat(const char* filename) -> SparseArray<float>*
>>>>> {
>>>>>     auto in = ImageInput::open(filename);
>>>>>     if (!in) return nullptr;
>>>>> 
>>>>>     auto spec = in->spec();
>>>>>     DPXfloat.SetSize(spec);
>>>>>     in->read_image(TypeDesc::FLOAT, DPXfloat.Values);
>>>>>     in->close();
>>>>> 
>>>>>     return &DPXfloat;
>>>>> }
>>>>> 
>>>>> and it is called this way:
>>>>> 
>>>>>     auto sut = new DPXio();
>>>>>     auto path = 
>>>>> "C:/sensomovie/C200/A011C118_19041345_CANON/A011C118_19041345_CANON_00001926.DPX";
>>>>>     //auto path = 
>>>>> "C:/sensomovie/C200/A014C203_190414BL_CANON_16bits/A014C203_190414BL_CANON_00001331.DPX";
>>>>> 
>>>>>     std::cout << (FileExist(path) ? "File OK: " : "No such file: ") << 
>>>>> path << "." << endl;
>>>>>     
>>>>>     auto result = sut->ReadFloat(path);
>>>>>     if (result == nullptr)
>>>>>         cout << "null result" << endl;
>>>>>     else
>>>>>     {
>>>>>         cout << "colors: " << result->Colors << endl;
>>>>>         cout << "width: " << result->Width << endl;
>>>>>         cout << "height: " << result->Height << endl;
>>>>>     }
>>>>> 
>>>>> The compilation arguments (I'm using VS2019 enterprise, toolset Visual 
>>>>> Studio 2019 (v142), but I have the same with v141):
>>>>> 
>>>>> /permissive- /Yu"pch.h" /GS /GL /W3 /Gy /Zc:wchar_t 
>>>>> /I"c:\lib\tiff\include" /I"c:\lib\openexr\include" 
>>>>> /I"c:\lib\oiio\include" /Zi /Gm- /O2 /sdl /Fd"x64\Release\vc142.pdb" 
>>>>> /Zc:inline /fp:precise /D "NDEBUG" /D "_CONSOLE" /D "_UNICODE" /D 
>>>>> "UNICODE" /errorReport:prompt /WX- /Zc:forScope /Gd /Oi /MD /FC 
>>>>> /Fa"x64\Release\" /EHsc /nologo /Fo"x64\Release\" 
>>>>> /Fp"x64\Release\oiioTest.pch" /diagnostics:classic 
>>>>> 
>>>>> M
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Le mar. 23 avr. 2019 à 23:39, till dechent <[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
>>>>> Yes I built version 2.0.6 as a release (x64) and it worked. I also tried 
>>>>> the DPX you provided and all was good.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Am Di., 23. Apr. 2019 um 21:44 Uhr schrieb Mathieu Prevot 
>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>>>> Please, can those who could open images with `ImageInput::open(filename)`
>>>>> tell if it was a release or debug build (of their own binary, not oiio's) 
>>>>> ? If it was a debug, can you test with a release build ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Many thanks
>>>>> M
>>>>> 
>>>>> Le lun. 22 avr. 2019 à 16:35, Mathieu Prevot <[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
>>>>> Tested with boost 1.68 and 1.70, both are OK with oiio debug, and opening 
>>>>> the DPX file works correctly in that configuration.
>>>>> Only when I build and use oiio release, it fails (with both boost 
>>>>> versions).
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm not sure where to go to continue the investigation.
>>>>> 
>>>>> For repro, my build script; which needs to be run in the ooio-master 
>>>>> folder as is. msbuild needs to be in $path.
>>>>> 
>>>>> $target = "Visual Studio 15 2017 Win64"
>>>>> 
>>>>> function configure {
>>>>>     
>>>>> I:\IntelSWTools\compilers_and_libraries_2019.3.203\windows\tbb\bin\tbbvars.bat
>>>>>  intel64 vs2017
>>>>>     cmake.exe -G $target -T v141, host=x64 -j16 `
>>>>>         
>>>>> -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH="I:/lib/tiff;I:\lib\boost-1.70;I:/lib/zlib;I:/lib/libpng;I:/lib/openexr;I:/lib/libjpegturbo"
>>>>>  `
>>>>>         
>>>>> -DTBB_ROOT_DIR="I:/IntelSWTools/compilers_and_libraries/windows/tbb" `
>>>>>         -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX="I:/lib/oiio-release" `
>>>>>         -DJPEGTURBO_PATH="i:/lib/libjpegturbo" `
>>>>>         -DUSE_QT=0 -DOIIO_BUILD_TESTS=1 -DUSE_PYTHON=0 `
>>>>>         -DPYTHON_EXECUTABLE="I:/intelpython2/python.exe" `
>>>>>         ..
>>>>> }
>>>>> 
>>>>> function build {
>>>>>     #"build oiio debug"
>>>>>     #MSBuild.exe OpenImageIO.sln /verbosity:m /m
>>>>>     "build oiio release"
>>>>>     MSBuild.exe OpenImageIO.sln /p:Configuration=Release /verbosity:m /m
>>>>> }
>>>>> 
>>>>> function install {
>>>>>     #"install oiio debug"
>>>>>     #MSBuild.exe INSTALL.vcxproj /verbosity:m /m
>>>>>     "install oiio release"
>>>>>     MSBuild.exe INSTALL.vcxproj /p:Configuration=Release /verbosity:m /m
>>>>> }
>>>>> 
>>>>> function clean {
>>>>>     if (test-path build) {
>>>>>         remove-item -recurse -force build
>>>>>     }
>>>>>     New-Item -ItemType Directory build
>>>>> }
>>>>> 
>>>>> clean
>>>>> Set-Location build
>>>>> configure
>>>>> build
>>>>> install
>>>>> Set-Location ..
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> M
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Le sam. 20 avr. 2019 à 19:10, Larry Gritz <[email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
>>>>> I'm not sure what else I can do unless I either have a case I can 
>>>>> reproduce on my end, or a more full stack trace or at least indication of 
>>>>> what specific line in the OIIO is where the exception is thrown (just 
>>>>> knowing precisely where the crash happens may be enough do diagnose or 
>>>>> defensively program around).
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2019, at 2:11 AM, till dechent <[email protected] 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ImageInput::open() works for me with the downloaded DPX on version 2.0.6.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Am Do., 18. Apr. 2019 um 18:41 Uhr schrieb Stephen Blair 
>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>>>>> It doesn't crash on Windows for me, but that's with OpenImageIO-Arnold 
>>>>>> 2.1.0dev
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 1:07 PM Larry Gritz <[email protected] 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi, thanks. I'm able to open that DPX file on my end (not on Windows), 
>>>>>> so I don't think it's a corrupt file.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Can you build all of OIIO in Debug mode (not Release) and use the 
>>>>>> debugger to find out what file and line is where the actual crash is 
>>>>>> occurring? The screenshot you provided only shows where in your unit 
>>>>>> test it was, so the actual crash could be practically anywhere inside 
>>>>>> what happens within the open() call.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm sorry I'm not easily able to help, I don't have access to a Windows 
>>>>>> machine.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Can somebody else out there who uses OIIO on Windows please do us a 
>>>>>> favor and download this DPX file in the links below, then try anything 
>>>>>> that forces an open (e.g., 'iinfo -v -stats blah.dpx') and report what 
>>>>>> happens? Does this crash for everybody? If anyone can reproduce, do you 
>>>>>> have any ideas or can you get closer to finding what line within the 
>>>>>> OIIO code is the source of the problem?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  -- lg
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Apr 18, 2019, at 1:16 AM, Mathieu Prevot <[email protected] 
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Following the documentation "4.1 Image Input Made Simple";
>>>>>>> I'm having an exception at opening a dpx file and tiff file from simple 
>>>>>>> code:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>     auto in = ImageInput::open(filename); // here
>>>>>>>     if (!in) return;
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Exception thrown at 0x00007FFDBEBDA388 in testhost.exe: Microsoft C++ 
>>>>>>> exception: Microsoft::VisualStudio::CppUnitTestFramework::CSEException 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> More detailed information:
>>>>>>> https://1drv.ms/u/s!AlUmbfQiLoTZhFQir--TvMglJ0iT 
>>>>>>> <https://1drv.ms/u/s!AlUmbfQiLoTZhFQir--TvMglJ0iT>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Images:
>>>>>>> https://1drv.ms/f/s!AlUmbfQiLoTZhFKpXHJcchpi0hBY 
>>>>>>> <https://1drv.ms/f/s!AlUmbfQiLoTZhFKpXHJcchpi0hBY>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm using the master version of oiio in windows with tiff 4.0.10, 
>>>>>>> openexr 2.3.0, zlib 1.2.11, libpng 1.6.35, boost 1.70, libjpegturbo 
>>>>>>> 2.0.3, tbb 2019.3; cmake 3.13.4, VS2017.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm running this in a c++ unit test, (with some c code since data will 
>>>>>>> be used in an interop context).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> TEST_CLASS(DPXioTests)
>>>>>>>     {
>>>>>>>     public:
>>>>>>>         TEST_METHOD(Instance)
>>>>>>>         {
>>>>>>>             auto sut = new DPXio();
>>>>>>>             Assert::IsNotNull(sut);
>>>>>>>         }
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>         TEST_METHOD(ReadDPX)
>>>>>>>         {
>>>>>>>             auto sut = new DPXio();
>>>>>>>             auto path = 
>>>>>>> "C:/sensomovie/C200/A011C118_19041345_CANON/A011C118_19041345_CANON_00001926.DPX";
>>>>>>>             if(!FileExist(path))
>>>>>>>             {
>>>>>>>                 wstringstream s;
>>>>>>>                 s << "No such file: " << path << ".";
>>>>>>>                 Logger::WriteMessage(s.str().c_str());
>>>>>>>                 return;
>>>>>>>             }
>>>>>>>             try
>>>>>>>             {
>>>>>>>                 auto result = sut->Read(path);
>>>>>>>                 Assert::IsNotNull(result);
>>>>>>>                 Assert::IsTrue(result->Colors >= 3);
>>>>>>>                 Assert::IsTrue(result->Height == 2160);
>>>>>>>                 Assert::IsTrue(result->Width == 4096);
>>>>>>>             }
>>>>>>>             catch (Exception& e)
>>>>>>>             {
>>>>>>>                 auto lastErrorID = GetLastError();
>>>>>>>                 if (lastErrorID != 0)
>>>>>>>                 {
>>>>>>>                     LPVOID errorBuffer{};
>>>>>>>                     FormatMessage(FORMAT_MESSAGE_ALLOCATE_BUFFER | 
>>>>>>> FORMAT_MESSAGE_FROM_SYSTEM | FORMAT_MESSAGE_IGNORE_INSERTS,
>>>>>>>                         nullptr, lastErrorID, MAKELANGID(LANG_NEUTRAL, 
>>>>>>> SUBLANG_DEFAULT), (LPTSTR)&errorBuffer, 0, nullptr);
>>>>>>>                     wstringstream s;
>>>>>>>                     s << "Exception: " << e.what() << ". ID: "<< 
>>>>>>> lastErrorID << ". Message: " <<  errorBuffer<< ".";
>>>>>>>                     Logger::WriteMessage(s.str().c_str());
>>>>>>>                 }
>>>>>>>                 else
>>>>>>>                 {
>>>>>>>                     wstringstream s;
>>>>>>>                     s << "Exception: " << e.what();
>>>>>>>                     Logger::WriteMessage(s.str().c_str());
>>>>>>>                 }
>>>>>>>             }
>>>>>>>         }
>>>>>>>     };
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Mathieu
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>>>>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Larry Gritz
>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>>>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>>>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>>>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Larry Gritz
>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Larry Gritz
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Larry Gritz
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>> 
>> --
>> Larry Gritz
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
> 
> --
> Larry Gritz
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Oiio-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org

_______________________________________________
Oiio-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org

Reply via email to